Sitaram's morality
Sitaram Adhikary, who came to Kathmandu with an empty pocket, has charted a different route to richness. For some of us he is a legend because he has inspired many other crooks and thugs in Nepal's academia and bureaucracy to accumulate corrupt wealth. Despite his obvious corruption and 5-star life style, Sitaram has not stopped preaching about morality and social values. In his opinion, this blog is immoral and anti-social. Definitely, for corrupt, murderer and thugs, this is bound to be so. Everyone who has some skeletons in their cupboard will generally think like that. But the case of Sitaram is different. He knows very well that a lie repeated 100 times turns a truth. Like that propagandist of the Hitler, KU's Goebbels has been spreading canards and rumours for an umpteenth time. And he is ably supported by extremely communal mandales who feel that by ingratiating with job providers like Sitaram, they can also reach the height of greatness. With his influential position, Sitaram has spread canard not only against the junior faculties but also against the founding members.
Sitaram, neck deep in corruption, has never desisted from talking about morality. In one interview for promotion, Sitaram flatly asked one aspiring candidate "What is morality?" The question was intended to humiliate the faculty for his taking classes outside KU. And the faculty had to take the classes outside KU because of the pressure from nephew of Suresh Raj, Mr. Manish Pokhrel. As Head of the department Manish himself requested, the faculty could not say no and started delivering the lectures in a college in Kathmandu. By doing that the faculty did not violate any rule as the faculties are empowered to take classes with permission from the department chief. Sitaram knew it very well that the computer department was destroyed by Mr. Manish Pokhrel. He knew it very well that Manish Pokhrel was the one who earned lacks of rupees by such immoral actions where he had forced even junior colleagues to go stray. Sitaram never did anything against Manish fearing enragement of VC Suresh Raj. Rather, he attacked other faculties who were merely following the instructions of Manish. Friends have claimed that the faculty would not have been humiliated in such a way had that faculty licked the boot of Brijesh. As Sitaram did not find the faculty's name in the "Friend's list" of the Brijesh, he did not hesistate to humiliate the faculty in the interview itself. This conduct of Sitaram created some flutters then and some of us had remarked that the same question should be posed to Sitaram.
However, Sitaram has never realized what are the true feelings of the faculties. Ensconced in his greatness as registrar and founder of KU, Sitaram thinks that his dealings are beyond questioning. So, he reasons that nobody should raise moral questions against him. His recent breaching of moral conduct definitely lies in his re-appointment as KU's newly created post of advisor. As KUPA movement gathered momentum, the corrupt Sitaram started feeling the heat. To save his scalp, he made his sickness an excuse to tender the resignation from the registrarship. By giving away the registrarship, he not only tried to please disgruntled Bhadra Man but also diverted the attack from him. But, once the movement focussed on total management change, he again appeared in a new role with an active connivance of Suresh Raj. The unconsitutional appointment of Sitaram as KU advisor is nothing but a shameless violation of KU statute. Sitaram has talked a lot about morality, in addition to talking about KU rules and regulations, when faculties have demanded incentives, perks and promotion . But, in his own case, Sitaram has shamelessly jettisonned academic norms to decorate the advisory board of KU. Advisory board of KU never existed till his retirement from registrarship. But, once he retired, it is created overnight. What kind of morality Sitaram is maintaining has become further clear with his reassociation with KU.
From these instances, we can easily find out what is Sitaram' morality. For him morality is something that others in KU must maintain. He, Suresh Raj and likes of Bhadraman will never be immoral even if they kill staffs in day broadlight. If such a lousy character spews venom on the faculties who have openely revolted against the dictatorship of Suresh Raj and himself, we need to reckon that there are some more skeletons in Sitaram's cupboard. Sitaram has been planting stories not only against one individual. He has been spreading rumours about many faculties who are as young as his own children. Here also Sitaram is claiming that his sons are pure and very sacred and other faculties who are demanding academic freedom are characterless. Sitaram should have justified his actions and he should have cleared his name only in various controversies. Is it necessary for him to assasinate the character of young faculties? He did it because he thinks that what registrar of KU speaks will be taken as a Gospel truth by everyone else.
Now, we feel that Sitaram should no longer live in an ivory tower and vitiate the KU environment. Faculties who have worked honestly in KU should rather be appreciated for their work instead of defaming them in lieu of demanding organisational rights. These faculties should never be shown inferior than anybody else. Yeah, inferior than even sons of registrar Sitaram. Because the obvious reason is that sons of Sitaram are far worse than many faculties in KU. Both the sons of Sitaram have very bad past records. It has been already claimed in this blog that from one of the unmarried son's room "a filled balloon" is discovered. In other words, how come a "scum filled condom" is recovered from one of the Sitaram's sons room? Both the sons were unmarried at that time. They were not going steady with anyone. And Nepali society is not so forward that girlfriends are taken home to sleep together. And we can not say that Sitaram and his wife sleeps in sons' room with all the kits for sleeping together. So, an obvious question that strikes the mind; Is it a incest as a result of juvenile delinquency? We do not hint that Sitaram's family maintain an incestious relationship between brothers and sisters. We simply ask the Sitaram how come that "scum filled condom" is found in your son's room? And Sitaram, you must know that there are many in KU who knows this story.This is the question many of us have in mind. We are asking this question to Sitaram because we know that he knows all these things. Though he never accepts that his sons are such a rascal, yet we are forcing him to mull over this.
Sitaram, you have spoken a lot and mobilised people a lot. We simply ask you to stop all these manipulations. It would be better if you please surrender yoursefl to CIAA and accept all your crimes. Instead of following the rule of law, if you keep on attacking, inciting and vandalising dignity of the faculty members with your so called moral questions, we are also bound to raise questions about your family and your sons with dubious characters.
Now it is time to stop!
Sitaram, neck deep in corruption, has never desisted from talking about morality. In one interview for promotion, Sitaram flatly asked one aspiring candidate "What is morality?" The question was intended to humiliate the faculty for his taking classes outside KU. And the faculty had to take the classes outside KU because of the pressure from nephew of Suresh Raj, Mr. Manish Pokhrel. As Head of the department Manish himself requested, the faculty could not say no and started delivering the lectures in a college in Kathmandu. By doing that the faculty did not violate any rule as the faculties are empowered to take classes with permission from the department chief. Sitaram knew it very well that the computer department was destroyed by Mr. Manish Pokhrel. He knew it very well that Manish Pokhrel was the one who earned lacks of rupees by such immoral actions where he had forced even junior colleagues to go stray. Sitaram never did anything against Manish fearing enragement of VC Suresh Raj. Rather, he attacked other faculties who were merely following the instructions of Manish. Friends have claimed that the faculty would not have been humiliated in such a way had that faculty licked the boot of Brijesh. As Sitaram did not find the faculty's name in the "Friend's list" of the Brijesh, he did not hesistate to humiliate the faculty in the interview itself. This conduct of Sitaram created some flutters then and some of us had remarked that the same question should be posed to Sitaram.
However, Sitaram has never realized what are the true feelings of the faculties. Ensconced in his greatness as registrar and founder of KU, Sitaram thinks that his dealings are beyond questioning. So, he reasons that nobody should raise moral questions against him. His recent breaching of moral conduct definitely lies in his re-appointment as KU's newly created post of advisor. As KUPA movement gathered momentum, the corrupt Sitaram started feeling the heat. To save his scalp, he made his sickness an excuse to tender the resignation from the registrarship. By giving away the registrarship, he not only tried to please disgruntled Bhadra Man but also diverted the attack from him. But, once the movement focussed on total management change, he again appeared in a new role with an active connivance of Suresh Raj. The unconsitutional appointment of Sitaram as KU advisor is nothing but a shameless violation of KU statute. Sitaram has talked a lot about morality, in addition to talking about KU rules and regulations, when faculties have demanded incentives, perks and promotion . But, in his own case, Sitaram has shamelessly jettisonned academic norms to decorate the advisory board of KU. Advisory board of KU never existed till his retirement from registrarship. But, once he retired, it is created overnight. What kind of morality Sitaram is maintaining has become further clear with his reassociation with KU.
From these instances, we can easily find out what is Sitaram' morality. For him morality is something that others in KU must maintain. He, Suresh Raj and likes of Bhadraman will never be immoral even if they kill staffs in day broadlight. If such a lousy character spews venom on the faculties who have openely revolted against the dictatorship of Suresh Raj and himself, we need to reckon that there are some more skeletons in Sitaram's cupboard. Sitaram has been planting stories not only against one individual. He has been spreading rumours about many faculties who are as young as his own children. Here also Sitaram is claiming that his sons are pure and very sacred and other faculties who are demanding academic freedom are characterless. Sitaram should have justified his actions and he should have cleared his name only in various controversies. Is it necessary for him to assasinate the character of young faculties? He did it because he thinks that what registrar of KU speaks will be taken as a Gospel truth by everyone else.
Now, we feel that Sitaram should no longer live in an ivory tower and vitiate the KU environment. Faculties who have worked honestly in KU should rather be appreciated for their work instead of defaming them in lieu of demanding organisational rights. These faculties should never be shown inferior than anybody else. Yeah, inferior than even sons of registrar Sitaram. Because the obvious reason is that sons of Sitaram are far worse than many faculties in KU. Both the sons of Sitaram have very bad past records. It has been already claimed in this blog that from one of the unmarried son's room "a filled balloon" is discovered. In other words, how come a "scum filled condom" is recovered from one of the Sitaram's sons room? Both the sons were unmarried at that time. They were not going steady with anyone. And Nepali society is not so forward that girlfriends are taken home to sleep together. And we can not say that Sitaram and his wife sleeps in sons' room with all the kits for sleeping together. So, an obvious question that strikes the mind; Is it a incest as a result of juvenile delinquency? We do not hint that Sitaram's family maintain an incestious relationship between brothers and sisters. We simply ask the Sitaram how come that "scum filled condom" is found in your son's room? And Sitaram, you must know that there are many in KU who knows this story.This is the question many of us have in mind. We are asking this question to Sitaram because we know that he knows all these things. Though he never accepts that his sons are such a rascal, yet we are forcing him to mull over this.
Sitaram, you have spoken a lot and mobilised people a lot. We simply ask you to stop all these manipulations. It would be better if you please surrender yoursefl to CIAA and accept all your crimes. Instead of following the rule of law, if you keep on attacking, inciting and vandalising dignity of the faculty members with your so called moral questions, we are also bound to raise questions about your family and your sons with dubious characters.
Now it is time to stop!
No comments:
Post a Comment